the grind
Tier-1 questions on repeat
The same refund, setup, and policy questions land in your inbox every day — and you already wrote the answers down in your docs. You're a copy-paste machine for your own help-center.
your corporation's first hire
early access — set up by the founder, by hand
Start your autonomous corporation with its first hire.
You're chartering a full AI corporation that does the work — this is the honest place to start: one concrete, reliable role you can stand up today. The first hire is a grounded support agent that answers your customers' tier-1 questions straight from your own docs, with a citation for every answer, and hands off to a human the moment it's unsure. The differentiator is simple: it won't bluff. That's the proof — before you trust the rest of the frontier agentic workforce, you watch the first hire be correct and honest.
Honest about the stage: the full self-serve corporation isn't live yet. Right now I stand up this first hire with you by hand — that's the point, you get the founder, and you see the platform prove itself before scaling the team.
customer: do you offer refunds after 30 days? answer Refunds are available within 30 days of purchase; after that, credit only. source: your-help-center.example/refund-policy ¶2 (your own words) customer: can you change the VAT on my past invoice? not in your docs — hand off to a human (no guess made)
why start here
A whole AI corporation is a big leap. So start with one hire you can trust.
Handing real work to autonomous agents only makes sense if the very first one earns your trust. A grounded support agent is the ideal first hire: it's a job you feel every day, it's easy to verify, and it's where bluffing does the most damage — so it's the truest test of whether the platform is honest. If you're a bootstrapped SaaS or store with a real help-center, the obvious fixes don't fit:
the fear
A confident wrong answer burns a customer
Generic GPT wrappers hallucinate and leave no audit trail. One made-up refund or integration answer can cost you a customer's trust — so you'd rather keep answering by hand.
the gap
The big tools don't fit your stage
Intercom Fin and Zendesk AI are built for teams that already pay for the platform and can absorb seat-based pricing. What's missing is a cheap, cited, auditable answer layer on the docs you already wrote — and a path that grows into a full frontier agentic workforce when you're ready.
how it works
You give us your docs. We stand up your corporation's first hire — cited, with human-handoff.
-
1 — You point me at your docs
Send your help-center / docs URL (or an export). I only read what you point me at — nothing is published, and nothing is reused. Your data stays yours.
-
2 — I ground the first hire on your corpus
Within 48 hours I take 5-10 of your real tier-1 questions and answer each one from your content — not the open internet. Every answer is grounded on the paragraph it came from. Same grounding discipline the wider corporation runs on.
-
3 — Every answer ships with a citation
Each answer links to the exact source paragraph in your help-center. You verify it yourself in seconds. This is the demo, not a promise.
-
4 — It hands off instead of guessing
I deliberately include a question your docs don't cover, and show the agent correctly abstaining — "route to a human" — instead of bluffing. You also get a simple dashboard with a resolution / abstention view and an audit log of what was answered and why. That fail-closed honesty is the same guardrail every future hire inherits.
what's true today
Five things this does — and the proof each is true right now.
No future-tense claims. Each value below is paired with what makes it literally true today, because the pilot is delivered by hand.
1 — It answers from YOUR docs, not the internet
Grounded retrieval is what stops the made-up answer: when an answer must come from your own corpus and cite the paragraph it used, the model can't fall back on whatever it half- remembers. That's the well-established reason grounded, cited answering is more reliable than ungrounded chat. In the pilot I ground every answer on your own content and the answer cites your text — you don't take that on faith, you click the citation and check it.
proof todayanswers in the pilot quote your help-center, not a model's memory
2 — Every answer carries a citation
Each hand-delivered answer links to the exact source paragraph in your help-center. You can check it yourself in seconds — verification is built into the deliverable.
proof todayyou receive cited answers you can click through and confirm
3 — It hands off instead of bluffing
Honesty under uncertainty is the whole point. The pilot deliberately includes a question your docs don't cover and shows the agent abstaining and routing to a human. False-confidence and abstention are tracked as first-class numbers, not hidden.
proof todaythe pilot shows a question it refuses to answer, on purpose
4 — It's audited and governed
Every answer in the pilot has an audit entry: what was asked, what was retrieved, and whether it answered or handed off — generated on every run, so you can see the reasoning, not just the result. (Governance and evaluation gaps are among the most-cited reasons agent projects stall before production — the hard part this platform is built around. The wider security platform is in active development, not yet a live production service.)
proof todayeach pilot answer has an audit-log entry showing the why
5 — You see resolution AND abstention
The dashboard shows how many tier-1 questions were resolved with a citation versus handed to a human — the two numbers a founder actually needs to trust deflection, instead of vanity metrics. It's the same inspector every agent in the full corporation reports through, so the first hire reads exactly like the team you grow into.
proof todaythe pilot dashboard reports resolved-with-citation vs handed-off
honest noteThis shape — turn your docs into a grounded, cited support agent — is a proven wedge for bootstrappers; products built on exactly this DNA have grown to real businesses on it. That's an analogy for why the approach works, not a claim about us: the first hire is the proof, and the full autonomous corporation is where it goes from here. We claim no customers, metrics, or certifications of our own.
the offer
Grounded Support Pilot — your corporation's first hire, set up by the founder.
The honest entry point into your autonomous corporation: one real first hire, delivered by hand. Not a subscription, not a self-serve signup — a real, cited proof from your own docs before you commit to anything or scale the team. Want to see it first? I'll send 2-3 cited answers from your docs free; the full pilot below is $49.
Grounded Support Pilot
$49 one-time
charged once before delivery · founder-delivered in 48 hours · no subscription
- 5-10 of your real tier-1 questions, answered from your own docs
- A citation on every answer, linking to the exact source paragraph
- One out-of-docs question shown handing off to a human, on purpose
- A dashboard with resolution / abstention and an audit log
- You work directly with the founder, start to finish
triple risk reversal
Why this is safe to try
No-answer, no-charge. If the cited answers aren't useful, you don't pay — or full refund, no questions asked.
No lock-in. It's a one-time pilot, not a subscription trap. You keep the answers either way.
Your data stays yours. I only read the docs you point me at. Nothing is published, nothing is reused.
The full autonomous corporation — a wider frontier agentic workforce, more roles, more capability — is where this grows, on plans that start free. But that's not the ask here. The first hire just answers, cited, and hands off everything else — so you can see the platform keep its word before you scale.
honest noteThis is early access and I deliver it by hand right now — that's the point. The full self-serve corporation isn't live yet, and I'd rather show you 10 real cited answers from your own docs than promise a magic button that doesn't exist. The first hire is where the bigger story earns the right to start.
straight answers
The questions you're already asking.
"AI support bots hallucinate and embarrass us."
Right — that's the whole reason this exists. It only answers from your docs, every answer is cited so you can check it, and when it's unsure it hands off to a human instead of guessing. In the pilot I'll deliberately show you a question it refuses to answer.
"Is the whole corporation live? Can I just sign up?"
Not the full self-serve corporation yet, and I won't pretend otherwise. Right now I set up the first hire for you by hand. You get the founder and 5-10 real cited answers from your own docs within 48 hours. Starting with one provable hire — instead of a magic button that doesn't exist — is the whole premise.
"Why not Intercom Fin or Zendesk AI?"
Those are great if you're already on their platform and can absorb seat-based pricing. This is for a bootstrapper with a help-center and no budget for that — cheap, cited, auditable, and pointed at the docs you already wrote. It starts at $49, not a per-seat contract.
"$49 — what's the catch? Will it auto-bill me?"
No catch, no subscription trap. It's a one-time pilot. If the cited answers aren't useful, you don't pay (or full refund). You keep the answers regardless.
"Will it take risky actions — issue refunds, change accounts?"
No, and that's intentional. The first hire only answers tier-1 questions with citations and hands off everything else. As your corporation grows beyond this hire, every action stays inside the same deny-by-default guardrails — capabilities are earned step by step as trust and reliability are proven, never granted at the entry point.
Start your corporation. Send me your docs URL.
One conversation, no commitment. Point me at your help-center and I'll send back 2-3 cited answers from your own docs, free, so you can see how it reads. If it's useful, the full first-hire pilot is 5-10 answers plus the handoff demo within 48 hours — $49 one-time, refunded if it's not useful — and the honest first step toward your full autonomous corporation.
The Agentic Corporation is in active development and the self-serve product isn't live yet. This pilot is founder-delivered by hand. No customers, metrics, or certifications are claimed; the benchmark figures above are cited as industry references, not our own results.